Posts Tagged ‘from’

Single-Cell RNA-Seq Reveals Dynamic, Random Monoallelic Gene Expression in Mammalian Cells | Science

Wednesday, January 13th, 2016

#SingleCell #RNASeq Reveals Dynamic, Random Monoallelic Gene Expression, occurring in ~20% of genes in mice cells
http://science.sciencemag.org/content/343/6167/193.abstract

MarsEdit 3 – Desktop blog editing for the Mac.

Thursday, January 7th, 2016

https://www.red-sweater.com/marsedit/

Mind Mapping Software: Mind Maps | MindMeister

Thursday, December 31st, 2015

perhaps useful for workflow viz
https://www.mindmeister.com/

Ewing AD*, Houlahan KE…..Stuart JM, Boutros PC (2015) “Combining accurate tumour genome simulation with crow d-sourcing to benchmark somatic single nucleotide variant detection” Nature Methods 12(7):623-630 (PMID: 25984700)

Monday, December 28th, 2015

Tumor genome simulation w/ #crowdsourcing to benchmark…SNV detection http://www.nature.com/nmeth/journal/v12/n7/full/nmeth.3407.html Addresses lack of gold standards & privacy

Ewing, Houlahan…..Stuart, Boutros (2015) “Combining accurate
tumour genome simulation with crowd-sourcing to benchmark somatic
single nucleotide variant detection” Nature Methods 12(7):623-630
(PMID: 25984700)

A crowdsourced benchmark of somatic mutation detection algorithms was
introduced for the ICGC-TCGA DREAM challenge. This has the advantage
of dealing with the lack of gold standard data and the issue of
sharing private genomic data. All groups worked on three different
simulated tumor-normal pairs generated with BAMSurgeon, by directly
adding synthetic mutations to existing reads. An ensemble of
pipelines outperforms the best individual pipeline in all cases,
assessed on the basis of recall, precision and F-score.
Parameterization and genomic localization both have an effect on
pipeline performance, while characteristics of prediction errors
differed for most pipelines.

Bias from removing read duplication in ultra-deep sequencing experiments

Friday, December 25th, 2015

Bias from removing read duplication [eg from PCR amplification] in ultra-deep #sequencing
http://bioinformatics.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2014/01/02/bioinformatics.btt771 pot. overcorrection issues

Zhou et al.

Bias from removing read duplication in ultra-deep sequencing experiments

Estimating variant allele frequency and copy number variations can be approached by counting reads. In practice, read counting is
complicated by bias from PCR amplification and from sampling coincidence. This paper assessed the overcorrection introduced while removing read duplicates. The overcorrection is a particular concern when the sequencing is ultra-deep and the insert size is short and non-variant.

Your coffee maker is a bacterial breeding ground

Friday, December 18th, 2015

Your coffee maker is a #bacterial breeding ground http://qz.com/564102/your-coffee-maker-is-a-bacterial-breeding-ground/ Bugs love the warm water but it appears cleaning is effective

QT:{{"
“The researchers only counted the number of different bacteria types in their samples, not the total cells. A CBS investigation earlier this year found bacteria including staphylococcus and E. coli on the Keurig machines it swabbed. More than half were harboring millions of bacteria cells.

Bacteria appear to thrive in the high temperatures and chemical makeup of the coffee making process itself. Neither user behavior, the type of coffee brewed, nor frequency of the machine’s use seemed to affect the composition of the bacteria present.”

"}}

Cell type- and brain region-resolved mouse brain proteome : Nature Neuroscience : Nature Publishing Group

Sunday, December 13th, 2015

Celltype & region–resolved mouse brain proteome
http://www.nature.com/neuro/journal/v18/n12/full/nn.4160.html proteins enriched there v liver & in specific regions (eg NCX v STR)

http://www.nature.com/neuro/journal/v18/n12/full/nn.4160.html

Room Meeting Reservation Tool

Sunday, November 29th, 2015

works w/ ipad & outlook but not gcal

https://www.yarooms.com/

Babies and cats as coauthors on a manuscript

Sunday, November 29th, 2015

Discussion about listing babies & cats as co-authors on scientific
manuscriptshttp://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/57120/can-i-add-a-baby-as-a-co-author-of-a-scientific-paper via @bornalibran #authorship

Enhancer Evolution across 20 Mammalian Species: Cell

Saturday, November 28th, 2015

#Enhancer Evolution across 20 Mammal[s is faster than for promoters] by @PaulFlicek lab http://www.cell.com/cell/abstract/S0092-8674(15)00007-0 H3K27ac & H3K4me3 #chipseq

http://www.cell.com/cell/abstract/S0092-8674(15)00007-0