linkstream2 microblog

https://gizmodo.com/the-pixel-4-is-redefining-the-smart-in-smartphone-1839074807

A lot of trails can be found here, including Westwoods
at the Branford/Guilford border

http://www.visitguilfordct.com/todo-category/recreation/todo/trail-maps-of-guilford-ct/

https://m.youtube.com/watch?feature=youtu.be&t=7m51s&v=d6nwLctqB3c

New pixel 4 announced today includes a new voice record app that does real-time transcription on-device.

The initial website for the Computation and Society Initiative just got live:

https://computationsociety.yale.edu/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Austerlitz

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transgenerational_epigenetic_inheritance

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Devil_facial_tumour_disease

QT:{{”
“Still, the paper contains essential insights which should frame discussion of data’s role in the economy. One concerns the imbalance of power in the market for data. That stems partly from concentration among big internet firms. But it is also because, though data may be extremely valuable in aggregate, an individual’s personal data typically are not. For one Facebook user to threaten to deprive Facebook of his data is no threat at all. So effective negotiation with internet firms might require collective action: and the formation, perhaps, of a “data-labour union”.

This might have drawbacks. A union might demand too much in
compensation for data, for example, impairing the development of useful AIs. It might make all user data freely available and extract compensation by demanding a share of firms’ profits; that would rule out the pay-for-data labour model the authors see as vital to improving data quality. Still, a data union holds potential as a way of solidifying worker power at a time when conventional unions struggle to remain relevant.”

“}}
https://www.economist.com/finance-and-economics/2018/01/11/should-internet-firms-pay-for-the-data-users-currently-give-away

https://your.yale.edu/research-support/office-sponsored-projects/resources/frequently-needed-yale-facts

67.5% indirect rate (vs 60% at bcm)

AKT1 gene
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3170413/