Archive for the ‘PopSci’ Category

Across 1,000 genomes, rarities abound | Genes & Cells | Science News

Friday, November 2nd, 2012

http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/346124/title/Across_1,000_genomes,_rarities_abound

The Science of Sticky Spheres » American Scientist

Saturday, October 20th, 2012

Interesting account of work on sphere packing. As the number of spheres increases from 4 (the tetrahedron), new things emerge : new seeds not built from previous solutions and flexible solutions that can have internal subparts twist without breaking contacts. Great animations of the later.

http://www.americanscientist.org/issues/pub/the-science-of-sticky-spheres

Predicting Publishing Futures | The Scientist Magazine(R)

Friday, October 19th, 2012

http://www.the-scientist.com/?articles.view/articleNo/32603/title/Predicting%20Publishing%20Futures http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v489/n7415/full/489201a.html http://klab.smpp.northwestern.edu/h-index.html

First WGS of multiple pancreatic cancer patients outlined in study by TGen, Mayo and SHC | Science Codex

Sunday, October 14th, 2012

http://www.sciencecodex.com/first_wgs_of_multiple_pancreatic_cancer_patients_outlined_in_study_by_tgen_mayo_and_shc-99930

Coaching a Surgeon: What Makes Top Performers Better? : The New Yorker

Saturday, October 13th, 2012

http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2011/10/03/111003fa_fact_gawande

Economics and genetics meet in uneasy union

Friday, October 12th, 2012

From EK:”
A very long paper discussing how genetic diversity of a population is related to economic development-
http://ideas.repec.org/p/bro/econwp/2010-7.html
…. featured in as Science Editor’s choice !!
[but]… enough people were disturbed by it
so they wrote up a comment in Nature…”

http://www.nature.com/news/economics-and-genetics-meet-in-uneasy-union-1.11565

authorship issues

Friday, October 12th, 2012

http://www.nature.com/naturejobs/science/articles/10.1038/nj7417-591a
Particularly relevant to genomics and refers to authorship on the main ENCODE paper
QT:”
Biagioli agrees that delineating each person’s contribution should help, but he says that the descriptions are frequently too brief. As an example, he cites the study published this month in Nature by the ENCODE Project Consortium [the ENCODE “main paper”] . It ascribes generic tasks such as “data analysis”, “writing” or “scientific management” to large sets of authors, making it impossible to tell, for example, who analysed which data.

TIME Magazine: Genetic Science: How Far Do We Go? – Jan. 17, 1994

Friday, October 12th, 2012

http://www.time.com/time/covers/0,16641,19940117,00.html
Interesting how much has changed… & remained the same

Nobel for Quantum ‘Parlor Trick’ That Could Make Super Computers – NYTimes.com

Friday, October 12th, 2012

http://www.nytimes.com/reuters/2012/10/09/world/europe/09reuters-nobel-physics.html

ENCODE: The human encyclopaedia : Nature News & Comment

Wednesday, October 10th, 2012

http://www.nature.com/news/encode-the-human-encyclopaedia-1.11312