Archive for the ‘x78qt’ Category

DDN News article on FunSeq

Wednesday, November 20th, 2013

http://www.ddn-news.com/index.php?pg=77&articleid=7857

BioTechniques – The Myth of the Single Genome

Monday, October 21st, 2013

BioTechniques – The Myth of the Single Genome
http://www.biotechniques.com/news/The-Myth-of-the-Single-Genome/biotechniques-347272.html

The Myth of the Single #Genome: fetal Y chr left in women + smaller microchimerism in specific tissues
http://www.biotechniques.com/news/The-Myth-of-the-Single-Genome/biotechniques-347272.html MT @xberthet

Navigating Collaborative Grant Research | Science Careers

Saturday, October 12th, 2013

A post in Science Careers discussed type of collaborative environment in the lab.

http://sciencecareers.sciencemag.org/career_magazine/previous_issues/articles/2013_09_13/science.opms.r1300136

Reuters Next — For Henrietta Lacks’ famous cells, new and unique protection

Friday, August 9th, 2013

http://preview.reuters.com/2013/8/7/for-henrietta-lacks-famous-cells-new-and-unique-1

http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/08/07/us-science-hela-idUSBRE9760YD20130807

QT:"

The decision applies only to researchers funded by NIH, which said it
"encourages" other scientists to abide by the agreement. Because
DNA-sequencing technology is cheap and ubiquitous in genetics labs,
the HeLa genome has been partly sequenced many times, and can easily
be fully sequenced again.

"Sequencing" refers to determining the precise order of the chemical
letters on a person’s genome, which is the full library of his or her
genetic information. Bits and pieces of that sequence spell out, for
instance, whether someone is at risk of diabetes or Alzheimer’s or
other genetic traits, as well as personal traits like the consistency
of ear wax.

These loopholes in the access agreement significantly weaken the NIH
move, said Mark Gerstein, a computational biologist at Yale University
who has raised concerns about threats to genetic privacy. "I doubt NIH
will get blanket agreement from scientists in every country" to follow
its protocol, "so it’s not clear what the agreement will be able to
accomplish."

"

Reuters Next — For Henrietta Lacks’ famous cells, new and unique protection

Friday, August 9th, 2013

http://preview.reuters.com/2013/8/7/for-henrietta-lacks-famous-cells-new-and-unique-1

QT:”

The decision applies only to researchers funded by NIH, which said it “encourages” other scientists to abide by the agreement. Because DNA-sequencing technology is cheap and ubiquitous in genetics labs, the HeLa genome has been partly sequenced many times, and can easily be fully sequenced again.

“Sequencing” refers to determining the precise order of the chemical letters on a person’s genome, which is the full library of his or her genetic information. Bits and pieces of that sequence spell out, for instance, whether someone is at risk of diabetes or Alzheimer’s or other genetic traits, as well as personal traits like the consistency of ear wax.

These loopholes in the access agreement significantly weaken the NIH move, said Mark Gerstein, a computational biologist at Yale University who has raised concerns about threats to genetic privacy. “I doubt NIH will get blanket agreement from scientists in every country” to follow its protocol, “so it’s not clear what the agreement will be able to accomplish.”

AAAS – 2009 Fellows

Saturday, July 27th, 2013

http://www.aaas.org/aboutaaas/fellows/2009.shtml

BioTechniques – Up In The Sky! It’s Super-Enhancers

Monday, June 17th, 2013

http://www.biotechniques.com/news/Up-In-The-Sky-Its-Super-Enhancers/biotechniques-343598.html#.Ub59JPaG1A9

Poking Holes in Genetic Privacy – NYTimes.com

Monday, June 17th, 2013

https://twitter.com/nytimes/status/346318841367908352
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/18/science/poking-holes-in-the-privacy-of-dna.html

QT:”
June 16, 2013
Poking Holes in Genetic Privacy
By GINA KOLATA

Not so long ago, people who provided DNA in the course of research studies were told that their privacy was assured. Their DNA sequences were on publicly available Web sites, yes, but they did not include names or other obvious identifiers. These were research databases, scientists said, not like the forensic DNA banks being gathered by the F.B.I. and police departments.

Experts were startled by what Dr. Erlich had done. “We are in what I call an awareness moment,” said Eric D. Green, director of the National Human Genome Research Institute at the National Institutes of Health.

Research subjects who share their DNA may risk a loss of not just their own privacy but also that of their children and grandchildren, who will inherit many of the same genes, said Mark B. Gerstein, a Yale professor who studies large genetic databases.

We need a sociologist of science…or a philosopher » Pharyngula

Sunday, April 21st, 2013

http://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/2013/03/23/we-need-a-sociologist-of-scienceor-a-philosopher/

BBC – Future Quantified self: The tech-based route to a better life?

Sunday, March 24th, 2013

http://www.bbc.com/future/story/20130102-self-track-route-to-a-better-life/print More thoughts :
http://blog.gerstein.info/2013/03/thoughts-on-bbc-future-quantified-self.html